Experiments show, that after repeated failures, the union of two recognized species may at last, under very favourable circumstances, give birth to fertile progeny. Such circumstances, therefore, the naturalist may conceive to have occurred again and again, in the course of the great lapse of ages.
—Charles Lyell,
Principles of Geology |
The fossil record provides the best and most convincing evidence for the prevalence of stabilization processes. Obviously, the origin of a new type of organism through a stabilization process would have two expected features:
Looking at fossils, then, leads to the conclusion that there is typically a discontinuity in the origin of new forms of life. For the origin of a fossil form usually seems quite abrupt and there is little change thereafter, that is, the typical fossil form appears to arise via saltation. Stabilization theory offers a simple genetic explanation of this finding: Fossil forms that appear to have a saltational origin are assumed to be the products of stabilization processes. In the past, however, saltation has never been accounted for in terms of well-understood genetic processes. Instead, it has merely been set forward as an observation inconsistent with the gradualistic processes posited by neo-Darwinian theory. Many paleontologists have emphasized saltation is the dominant pattern seen in fossils. Georges Cuvier was the first. NEXT PAGE >>
Most shared on Macroevolution.net: