data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cade3/cade3200f9b069fa17fd0c3b231d60643f5ff5a9" alt="two bull-men"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71da2/71da27c6310db368e9e9782fdb13e7ee4a58b660" alt="Sumerian bull-man"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c53ec/c53ecf67b59a08e649cfa0ce8e7e10de582fe75c" alt="Mesopotamian bull-man"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f540f/f540fda344da3f465042ea1f04f9fccbd07ec546" alt="Bull-man"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea85/cea857de7d2be9b88e40dc7c7282e09a6db10938" alt="bullmen"
.
This page was a draft for a chapter of my book Telenothians, available here.
Some born of a cow have the foreparts of a man; others, on the contrary, spring up begotten of a woman but with the head of a cow.
—Empedocles, Fragments
|
The Minotaur, of course, is a cow-human hybrid, which nearly everyone dismisses as a myth. But there are also many reports alleging that actual hybrids of this sort have been birthed, both by cows and by women. Beyond the recent alleged birth of three separate cow-human hybrids in Asia, and the widespread belief in Japan that such creatures, known in Japanese as “kudans,” actually exist, there are dozens of reports about cow-human hybrids being birthed both in Europe and here in America, many of which are quoted on this webpage. Some of these cases seem fairly well attested, in particular the following, which appeared in a medical journal.
Wagendrüssel. In 1827, an article describing a cow-human hybrid, born alive, appeared in the May-June issue of Magazin der ausländischen Literatur der gesammten Heilkunde (Schreter 1827, pp. 487-489). The Magazin, published by two Hamburg physicians, Nikolaus Heinrich Julius (1783-1862) and Georg Hartog Gerson (1788-1844), was a German medical periodical anthologizing foreign literature of interest to doctors. The following is the complete article, quoted in translation, originally written in German by Dr. David Schreter, an Austro-Hungarian general practitioner who claimed to have examined the specimen himself. The translated title of the article is “A Description of a Monstrous Creature Birthed by a Cow in the Town of Wagendrüssel in the Hungarian County of Zipser.”
On the 14th of March, 1825, Benjamin Münich, a resident of the mountain town of Wagendrüssel† bought — at least so he claims — a pregnant cow from a certain Johann Krall of Stellbach. On the 25th of the following month, in the afternoon, the beast was having difficulty giving birth and both the owner and his wife were assisting. They were appalled when, instead of a normal calf, they were confronted with a monstrous birth, which they at once put to death. This strange animal was stuffed by a local businessman, and it was also painted by Johann Müller, an artist from the nearby town of Leutschau.‡ Eight or ten days passed before the authorities there in Zipser launched a legal inquiry into the matter.
This deformed creature has a crown-rump length of three feet [~90cm] and, when placed upon its feet, is about two feet tall. The head is large, and looks quite similar to a human being’s. From the superior portion of the frontal bone across the face to the chin, it measures ten inches [~25cm, that is, about the same measurement as in an adult human being]. The frontal and parietal bones define a fontanelle like that in the skull of an ordinary human infant. The sagittal suture is one inch long. On its head, from the fontanelle back, it has one-inch-long golden brown hair. On both sides the ears are rather small and human-like, but their lobes end in three-inch-long calf ears covered with sparse hair at their tips. The face is smooth and hairless, the eyes a beautiful blue, and the eyebrows a dark brown. The tip of the nose is flattened, with the nostrils distanced from each other by a septum thicker than that seen in human beings. The upper jaw, which lacks teeth [cows lack upper incisors], bears an upper lip like a human’s; the lower has ten thin, sharp teeth, and is more similar to a calf’s. On the chest are two rounded breasts with well-formed, prominent areolae 2.5 inches in circumference. These mammae are elevated somewhat (about half an inch) above the surrounding surface, as in a young woman. The torso and buttocks are like those of a human being, but the body is longer in proportion to the extremities. There is a naked eight-inch tail, about half an inch in diameter. The genitalia are female. Between the hind legs is an udder, and some of the umbilical cord remains attached. The upper portion of each of the four extremities is naked, as is the general surface of the torso, but the lower portions are covered with glossy brown hair. Each leg ends in a cloven hoof like that of a cow.
The fact that the birth of this creature actually took place is witnessed by the entire municipal authority of Wagendrüssel and nearly all of the inhabitants of the town, as well as by the members of the committee set up by the County of Zipser to investigate the matter.
David Schreter, M.D., general practitioner at Leutschau.
[Translated by E. M. McCarthy.]
† Present-day Nálepkovo in Slovakia.
‡ Now Levoča in Slovakia.
So this cow-human hybrid described by Schreter differs from the Minotaur of Greek myth, in having a human head and body, but the tail and legs of a cow. Most accounts of the Cretan Minotaur give him the head of a bull. With its human head and four hoofed feet, the hybrid just described is like the more ancient bull-man deities of Mesopotamian culture.
Unadilla. But Schreter’s is not the only report published in a medical journal. Twenty years earlier, an article (Yates 1808, pp. 254-256) about a cow-human hybrid appeared in the journal Philadelphia Medical Museum, edited by the prominent Philadelphia physician John Redman Coxe (1773-1864), who was also a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School. The author of the report was Dr. Christopher C. Yates (1779-1848), a physician practicing in Albany, New York. Yates report was communicated to Coxe, by another University of Pennsylvania professor, James Woodhouse (1770-1809). Yates' report reads,
Albany, June 15, 1807.
Dear Sir,
I HAVE it in my power to communicate something new and extraordinary to you.
A very extraordinary animal was produced by a three year old heifer, near the Unadilla river, in the western district of this state. On the 26, of last April, in the afternoon, the heifer exhibited symptoms of great distress, which increased, and urged an almost constant bellowing; this, together, with the great agony she appeared to be in from her conduct, induced the owner to shut her up in the stable under the impression that “she was getting mad.” Her bellowing continued till near day break; the owner supposing her dead, got out of bed and went with a light to the stable, when to his surprise he found her licking what he supposed was her calf; on a nearer approach he discovered its form different from what he expected, and attempted to take it up by the legs, when the heifer darted at him with violence, struck her hoof against the monster’s head and broke it; he however took it home, but is not positive whether it shewed signs of life, he thinks it did ; he says he did not suspect the heifer to be with calf.
The owner of the heifer sold it to two countrymen, who brought it to this city and immediately procured a five gallon jar, put it in and filled it with spirits. I prevailed on the man to take it out and permit me to examine it for a few moments; he gratified me, and I shall endeavour to give you an outline of this monster.
From the forehead over to the back of the neck, it very much resembles a child; indeed the head from a back view would be mistaken for that of a child. The nose resembles about as much that of a negro as of a calf, I think rather more.
The eyes (or rather sockets without eye-balls†) are situated about three inches from each side of the upper part of the nose, in the side of the head, on a line with the os nasi.
It has no distinct upper jaw; a few loose bones are felt immediately on the introduction of the finger into the mouth, under the nostrils.
The under jaw extends about one inch beyond a line with the tip of the nose, and measures in all about two and a-half or three inches, and is shaped like a harpoon (thus >). It has no tongue. The mouth inside apparently rough, but feels smooth. Ears much like those of a calf, though small in proportion and placed unnaturally back, near, or on the neck; they are about two inches long, and one and a half broad.
The arms or fore legs resemble the human; there is one joint more; it measures from the shoulder to the elbow about four inches; from the elbow to the next joint (which is half way between the elbow and hoofs) three inches; from thence three inches to the wrist ; in this division are two bones as in the human frame; from here the hoofs or webbed fingers begin to extend themselves, dividing into five parts, distinguishing thumb and fingers, having at the extremity small marks or spots where the nails should have been, the substance of the hand or hoof the same as of the calf. From below the under jaw or chin down to the pubes, human; breast broad, abdomen full.
Immediately below the pubes, are two appendages like the teats of a cow, (and about as far apart from each other) or, from their flaccidity I might more properly compare each to a separate infant scrotum; the one is as large again as the other.
No organs of generation‡—has an anus situated properly ; and a small tail about three or four inches above the anus up the back, about the thickness of a crow’s quill, and an inch and a-half or two inches long.
From the haunches down to the knees apparently human, no knee pan, in other respects, down to the hoofs or toes, similar to the arms and hands.
Its form evinces that its natural posture in walking would have been erect!§ The skin appears exactly like the human, and the colour a darkish yellow. No hairs, excepting a little on the arms and legs, of a reddish cast and hardly perceptible. At the first glance every one is impressed with its resemblance to a negro child, and many suppose it the issue of a man with the heifer. I hope it will go to your city.
Yours &c,
CHRIS. C. YATES.
Dr. John Redman Coxe [Editor of the journal]
These are page images of Yates (1808, pp. 254-256), an eyewitness account of an ostensible cow-human hybrid, which appeared in the journal Philadelphia Medical Museum:
The following, published in the journal Medical Brief (1893, vol. 21, p. 1455, col. b), is a reply by physician, Dr. J. B. Ramsey, to a question asked by another physician in a previous issue of the Brief, who wished to know whether there were any well-authenticated cases of a human being impregnating an animal or vice versa.
There have not only been medical reports about ostensible cow-human hybrids, such as those just quoted, but innumerable news reports as well, many of which are quoted below.
Würzburg, Germany. The next case, which was supposedly witnessed by members of the faculty of the medical faculty of the School of Medicine of the University of Würzburg, appeared in the May 13, 1858, issue of Courrier Franco-italien, a newspaper published in Paris:
Würzburg is in northwestern Bavaria. Although the material quoted above comes from a Paris newspaper, the fact that this event occurred is also attested by various Bavarian newspapers (for example, here and here).
Auburn, Maine. In a story in the Lewiston Evening Journal (May 12, 1915, p. 12), an account is given of various freak animals preserved by a local taxidermist, E. J. Boucher of Auburn, Maine. Six different monstrous calves are described, and “One of the six was a calf with a human head. The eyes were close together, eyebrows were present, the nose was ape-like and the jaw perfectly human.”
Lunenburg, Vermont. Another, relatively recent case is reported in the St. Johnsbury Caledonian (Sep. 3, 1913), a newspaper published in St. Johnsbury, Vermont:
Frank T. Harris of Lunenburg† has in his possession the body of a calf that has a perfect human face, the only thing of its kind ever known to scientists. He will exhibit this freak at the Caledonia County Fair. The calf is Holstein and has a black and white body, but the head and face are in human form, except the ears. The calf weighed about 30 pounds and had no hair, except a slight beard on the face. It is a wonder that everyone will want to see.
An affidavit signed by many well-known people of Lunenburg, states they saw the freak just after it was born and that it is unquestionably genuine. It has been called to the attention of the medical authorities of Harvard and they state that such a thing was never known before and will revolutionize medicine. The animal has no marks of sex‡ and is one of the wonders of the 20th century.
Milton, Oregon. A second report that same year, originally published in the Milton, Oregon, Eagle, appeared in the Nyssa, Oregon, Gate City Journal (Oct. 2, 1913, p. 5):
Buckeye, Arizona. The Phoenix, Arizona, Republican (Mar. 28, 1913, p. 6) reported a third case that year:
Note that this last case, the creature born at Buckeye, may have been a hybrid conjoined twin, an exceedingly rare phenomenon.
Oklahoma. An animal somewhat similar to the one pictured in the animated gif above, was living in a sanctuary in Oklahoma, in 2008. A photograph can be viewed here. Internet hype claims it was produced by aliens.
Malang, Dutch East Indies. The next report is from the Dutch-language newspaper De Indische Courant (Mar. 31, 1933, p. 2, col. 5), published in the city of Malang on the island of Java (given here in English translation):
Ashland, Kentucky. And a report about a similar case, originally published in the Cincinnati, Ohio, Times-Star, appeared in the Maysville, Kentucky, Daily Public Ledger (Jul. 11, 1912, p. 4, col. 3):
Goncelin, France. Another twentieth-century report describing a cow-human hybrid appeared in the March 9, 1909, issue (p. 2, col. 1) of the French newspaper L’Ouest-Éclair:
GRENOBLE, March 8. — A very odd freak has just been born at Goncelin [a commune in the Isère department in southeastern France about 32 kilometers northeast of Grenoble].
A cow belonging to M. Henri Tissot, a merchant, just gave birth to a monstrous animal with the body of an ordinary calf, but with a head that greatly resembles that of a human being, except that it is about one-third larger than that of a human adult.
M. Ruillier, a veterinarian at Pontcharra, when contacted, said he had never before seen anything like it and, given that the monster had been born dead, that he had asked M. Tissot, who agreed, to allow him to dissect the animal’s head in order to report on the case to the [French] national school [of veterinary medicine] at Lyon.
The head of this monster weighed 5 kilograms [about 11 pounds]. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original French.]
Tepljuh, Croatia. Another case was reported that same year from a village in what is now Croatia. An account of the event appeared in the June 10, 1909, issue of the Austro-Hungarian newspaper Neue Schlesische Zeitung:
Orange, Texas. A brief mention of another supposed cow-human hybrid appeared in the September 3, 1910, issue of the Palestine Daily Herald, published in Palestine, Texas (source). It simply states that “Sheriff Davis of Orange [Texas] has in his possession a calf with a human head.” A somewhat longer notice, which originally appeared in the Orange, Texas, Leader, was published in the Brownsville, Texas, Herald (Oct 17, 1910, p. 2):
Sedalia, Missouri. The next case is especially remarkable in that it involves a fully viable specimen that supposedly survived for more than a year. The report appeared in the Butler, Missouri, Weekly Times (Jan. 9, 1908, p. 10, col. 2):
The description given for the Sedalia animal seems atypical with regard to its diminutive size and the presence of hair covering the body. Such births are usually described as being mostly hairless, like a human being.
Iowa. The next report appeared in the Leon, Iowa, Reporter (May 2, 1901, p. 11, col. 4):
Another Iowa report appeared in the Pocahontas County Sun (Feb. 24, 1898, p. 8, cols. 1-2; access: newspaperarchive.com):
Uttar Pradesh, India. Two cow-human hybrids have been reported from the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, one at the end of the nineteeth century, the other in 2017. The first report appeared in newspapers across the globe in the summer of 1899. The following is from an Australian paper, the Northern Star (Lismore, New South Wales, Aug. 9, 1899, p. 6, col. 2). However, the same story ran in many other British Empire newspapers. The event supposedly took place in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh. Given that the birth occurred in India, the type of cow involved in this case would be a zebu, not Bos taurus.
2017 Uttar Pradesh birth. The second Uttar Pradesh birth was reported online in early June of 2017 as having taken place in the city of Muzaffarnagar (see video above). This creature, too, had a humanlike head. Its eyes, nose and ears resembled those of a human, and it had a naked body like that reported for most such births (ordinary calves are not born naked). According to the reports, it survived about half an hour. Locals worshiped it as a god. Thus, Mahesh Kathuria, visiting the shelter where this creature was born, expressed his opinion that: “God has taken birth from the body of a local cow. We came here to seek his blessings. Religiously, it is an avatar of Vishnu. We believe it’s a similar character to that mentioned in the Bhagavata Puran, a Hindu religious text.”
Gadsden, Tennessee. Another cow-human hybrid, which was supposedly born the previous year, was reported from Gadsden, a small town in western Tennessee. The following is a screenshot of a brief article appearing on page 2 (col. 3) of the Savannah Courier, Savannah, Tennessee, on Mar. 25, 1898 (source). The source of the story was the Alamo Signal, a newspaper published in Alamo, Tennessee, a town near Gadsden.
Yet another cow-human hybrid was reported in the Los Angeles Herald (Jan. 6, 1898, p. 10, col. 6). An article entitled “Collector of Freaks” gives an account of the specimens in a collection of abnormal animals owned by a certain Fred A. Robinson. Most of the animals described were of a fairly run-of-the-mill variety, but the following excerpt records something exceptional.
Langenrohr. The following appeared on page 7, column 1 of the July 4, 1894, issue of the newspaper Znaimer Wochenblatt, which was published in Znojmo (Znaim), a town in what is now the Czech Republic:
Tulln and Sieghartskirchen are small towns in what is now northeastern Austria.
Shallotte Township, North Carolina. Another cow-human hybrid was reported in the Goldsboro, North Carolina, Headlight (Jun. 20, 1895, p. 3):
So here we have another case of a viable cow-human hybrid being killed by, perhaps superstitious, people who objected to its very existence. This last case, incidentally, is an obvious example of a bilateral gynandromorph, in which, it is thought, the initial division of the zygote gives rise to two lines of cells that follow two separate developmental pathways for the right and left halves of the body, in this case that of a human being and that of a cow.
Indiana. Another report about a viable cow-human hybrid, born in Crawford County, Indiana, appeared in the Indianapolis newspaper Indiana State Sentinel (May 3, 1893, p. 8, col. 3). This case is of especial interest because the structure of the hybrid differs from that usually described in that it was supposedly like a human from the waist forward, but like a cow from that point back.
Another report from Indiana appeared in the Bloomington Daily Leader (Mar. 15, 1884, p. 2, col. 1; source: newspaperarchive.com):
An additional case from the Hoosier State appeared in the Hagerstown, Indiana Exponent (Sep. 8, 1880, p. 3, col. 2; source: newspaperarchive.com):
Remarkably, a second such case, also born at Laurel appeared in the Connersville Daily Examiner (Mar. 21, 1890, p. 2, col. 2; source: newspaperarchive.com):
Another appeared in the Jeffersonville, Indiana, Evening News (Nov. 27, 1875, p. 1, col. 2; source: newspaperarchive.com):
The Shelby mentioned in this last report, is apparently Shelbyville, Indiana, which did in fact have a newspaper named the Republican
Paris, Texas. One ostensible cow-human hybrid was reported in the Houston Daily Post (Dec. 4, 1895, p. 11, col. 7):
Shreveport, Louisiana. Another case appeared in the Fort Worth, Texas, Gazette (Mar. 9, 1892, p. 3, col. 4):
Shreveport, La., March 8.—There is on exhibition in this city a monstrosity in the shape of a calf with human characteristics. The “what is it?” came into the world Sunday last [i.e., March 6, 1892] on the Freewater place, this parish, and was dead at birth. Several physicians have examined the freak and pronounce it marvelous. Its head is shaped somewhat like that of a negro, and the breast is of perfect human shape. It is sexless, and the fore feet are shorter than the hind ones, lending them a look of arms.
Jackson, Mississippi. A second 1892 case is from nearby Mississippi, but cannot be the same case since the report predates the March 6, 1892, birth date implied by the previous quotation. This report appeared on of the issue of the Pascagoula, Mississippi, Democrat-Star (Jan. 15, 1892, p. 4, col. 4):
Florida. Another such report appeared in the Jeffersonville, New York, Sullivan County Record (Aug. 2, 1889, p. 4):
Reports about another calf with a human head born in Florida appeared in U.S. newspapers in 1876 (e.g., in the Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania newspaper The Jeffersonian, Sept. 28, 1876, p. 1, col. 5). The following information about this birth appeared in the Yuma, Arizona, Sentinel (Nov. 4, 1876, p. 3, col. 3):
Boswell’s Depot, Virginia. The Cambria Freeman (Sep. 2, 1887, p. 2, col 6) published the following report, which, since it provides no specifics as to the identity of the witnesses, is little more than hearsay.
Silver Creek, Nebraska. The following is from the Columbus, Nebraska Journal (Feb. 22, 1888, p. 2, col 5). It originally appeared in the Silver Creek Times. Silver Creek is a village in Merrick County, 16 miles southwest of Columbus.
Friendship, New York. The next case appeared in the Dunkirk, New York, Evening Observer (Apr. 14, 1885, p. 4, col. 4):
Additional information about the last mentioned event was given in the Newark, New York, Union (Apr. 4, 1885, p. 4, col. 4):
A second case in New York that same spring was reported in the Potsdam Junction, New York, Commercial Advertiser (Mar. 5, 1885, p. 2, col. 2):
Ohio. Three cases are reported as having occurred in Ohio, one in 1885, one in 1886, another in 1888. The first case appeared in the Woodsfield, Ohio, Spirit of Democracy (Jan. 13, 1885, p. 3). It originally appeared in the Bellaire Independent. The notice reads as follows:
The second, mentioned in the Springfield, Ohio, Globe-Republic (Mar. 18, 1886, p. 4), reads, “Up at Shelby, Ohio, a calf has been born with a human head.” More details about this Shelby birth appear in a special section below.
The third appeared in Island Pond, Vermont’s Essex County Herald (Sep. 21, 1888, p. 1, col. 2). The Herald notes that the article, which reads as follows, was taken from the Cincinnati Enquirer.
Two reports describe animals lacking a brain, a condition known as anencephaly:
Winchester, Virginia. From the Astoria, Oregon, Daily Astorian (Jul. 31, 1883, p. 1, col. 2):
Warren, Maine. From the Brownville, Nebraska, Advertiser (Jun. 5, 1879, p. 4, col. 3):
Fort Scott, Kansas. Another case in 1879 is mentioned in the Dodge City Times (Aug. 2, 1879, p. 8, col. 2):
Prattsville, New York. The following is from the Cobleskill, New York Index (Mar. 20, 1879, p. 3, col. 1). It originally appeared in the Prattsville, New York News.
Paterson, New York. And the following is from the Port Jervis, New York, Tri-states Union (Sep. 13, 1878, p. 3, col. 2). The story was originally published in the Paterson, New Jersey, Guardian.
Brooklyn, New York. A notice about a human-cow hybrid appeared in the Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Jeffersonian (Nov. 26, 1874, p. 1 , col. 5):
Another report about the same creature:
Thirty years later, in a notice appearing in the Owensville, Missouri, Gasconade County Republican (May 27, 1904) a second case of a similar nature was mentioned as having occurred in Texas:
This case, in which a human arm was attached to the back of a bull, parallels another case, an ostensible deer-cow hybrid, a male animal that looked like a bull with the muzzle and pelt of a deer, and that had in the middle of his back a well-formed deer leg, which was attached to a male member about a foot long, including two testicles. This phenomenon of a hybrid, which has the overall appearance of one of its parents, having one or more appendages that are like those of the other parent (“exterogenetic parasitic attachments”), and, often, seemingly randomly attached, is seen in various other distant hybrids (example #1, example #2, example #3, example #4, example #5; see other cases in the conjoined twins article).
The three following cases involve similar births. In each case, a calf or cow had, atop its own head, a growth similar in size and shape to a human head.
A Japanese museum specimen. The bizarre specimen pictured at right seems to be known only from a Japanese postcard. As can be seen from the image, it had a human-like head, sheathed with cow hair, atop its ordinary calf head. According to a (most helpful!) translator, the caption in the photo reads: “I was born in Beppu, Bungo,” which is an old name of Oita Prefecture [私しや (I was) 豊後の別府の (Bungo, Beppu) 生れ (born in)]. One website says this creature was born in 1926. Oita Prefecture is on Kyushu, the southernmost major island of Japan. This picture was supposedly taken in Kobe. Note that this specimen has the same conformation as the Parisian cow described by Morand below, and the Shelby, Ohio, animal, also described below.
Paris. Jean-François-Clément Morand (1812), a Parisian physician, describes a cow that he saw at the St. Germain fair in 1748. He says this animal had “atop its true head, a growth of the same size and form as a human head” (Original French: “au-dessus sa vraie tête, un kiste ayant la grosseur et la forme d’une tête humaine”). This is exactly the conformation seen in the Japanese specimen shown in the photo at left. He also notes that she had calved 12 offspring.
Ohio. Another such report appeared in the Ohio Democrat (Mar. 18, 1866, p. 2, col. 3), a newspaper published in Tuscarawas County, Ohio. Headlined, “A Calf with a Human Head,” it reads, “Shelby, O., March 12—A cow belonging to W. H. Morris of this city gave birth this forenoon to one of the most remarkable monstrosities on record. It was a well formed calf, with a large sized lump, a perfect representation of a human head, between the ears. The head of the calf was otherwise well formed. It will probably be given into the hands of an expert taxidermist and properly prepared for exhibition.” (This report can be accessed through newspaperarchive.com)
There were various cases of ostensible cow-human hybrids reported in the eighteenth century.
Clayworth. In the June 1752, issue of the Gentleman’s Magazine, there is an account, “Extract of a Letter from a Clergyman at Clayworth in Nottinghamshire” (Anonymous 1752), of a creature half calf and half human born of a cow.
The name of the clergyman in question is not specified, but given the small size of the parish of Clayworth, he would almost certainly have been Reverend James Carrington, who was at that time Rector of Clayworth. The following is the extract published from his letter: “I should have wrote sooner but that I wanted to be satisfy’d in the truth of a report of a monstrous production in a neighbouring village. The animal in question
Nemyriv. Another report from the eighteenth century appeared in a supplement to the July 1784, issue of Observations sur la Physique, l’Histoire naturelle et sur les Arts, a scholarly journal published by the botanist Jean-Baptiste François Rozier and his nephew, scientist and explorer Jean-André Mongez. In this case, the report includes an intaglio plate showing the specimen (see image below), but the head is considerably less like a human’s than in the other accounts, perhaps because this individual had undergone only seven months of development, whereas the other reports listed here seem all to refer either to the products of full-term pregnancies (in both cattle and humans the gestation period is approximately 280 days). It is also possible that development was simply aberrant in this case, as it is in a certain fraction of the individuals produced by some hybrid crosses.
Still, in the individual pictured, the lower portion of face is quite similar to a human being’s, as is the cranial region. This illustration is the only one on this page that is, apparently, drawn by an artist with access to an actual specimen, except for that of Schreyer (below) and, perhaps, Martin Luther’s Monk-calf (also pictured below). The distribution of facial hair, as shown in the picture (which is similar to what in humans is called a Van Dyke) is of interest because it is consistent both with several other mentions of facial hair around the mouth in other reports quoted on this page. The limitation of hair to the lower portions of the legs is also consistent with the descriptions of both Carrington and Schreter. At any rate, click on the box below to reveal the collapsible text of a translation of Rozier and Mongez’s original report:
Boston, Massachusetts. George Lyman Kittredge (1916, p. 37) notes that in 1716 the Puritan minister and author Cotton Mather (1663-1728) reported to the Royal Society, via a letter to Dr. John Woodward (1665-1728) of Gresham College in London, that a cow near Boston had produced a calf with a face like a human being’s. In the same article (p. 18), Kittredge states that “No historical student would think of denying that Cotton Mather was one of the best informed Americans of his time in scientific matters.”
Zeitz, Germany. The German physician Johannes Schreyer (1682) reports a creature found in the White Elster (Weiße Elster) River near the German town of Zeitz on July 17, 1681 (two miles downstream at the village of Bornitz), which he says had the head of a human being and the body of a calf. His letter to the editors of the Leipzig University scientific journal Acta eruditorum included an illustration of the rotting carcass, a crude woodblock print (shown at right). As can be seen in the picture, the abdomen of the animal is distended, perhaps by gasses released by internal decomposition, as is usually the case with bodies left to rot in warm water; the prominence atop the head, evident in the picture, may represent a protrusion, due to similar pressures, of convoluted brain matter through the fontanelle, which would explain why Schreyer describes it as “corrugated” since the convolutions of the brain would have that appearance. Note that the tufted tail is similar to that shown in Rozier and Mongez’s illustration above. This animal bore a beard on its chin, according to Schreyer, as did those in several of the other accounts on this page. His report, as translated from the original Latin, reads as follows:
On July 17, 1681, the river that flows past Zeitz [i.e., the White Elster] produced near the village of Bornitz a horrible monster having the head of a man affixed to the neck of a calf. The head bore a prominence above [see illustration], enveloped in a corrugated membrane. The eyes were shut. The ears were like a cat’s. The nose, which lacked a left nostril, was flat. The mouth gaped and bore teeth in both jaws. On the chin was a beard like that of a goat. The neck was quite long. The breast and forefeet were those of a calf, the hind, of a pig [four-toed?], and the tail was short and hairy at the end. Otherwise, this monster, which was of the female sex, was hairless and black. No interior examination was made due to the horrid stench of the putrid carcass. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin]
Other German cases. The chronicler Johann Christoph Becmann, a professor at the University of Frankfurt, stated (Historische Beschreibung der Chur und Mark Brandenburg, 1751, vol. 1, p. 883) that a calf “with many human parts” was born at Drebkau in 1673. Martin Schurig (1731, p. 582, §72) records a report by Caspar Theophil Bierling, who claimed that in 1659, a two-year-old girl had been living at Halle (Salle) who had a one normal eye, but the other, like that of a calf. In a report of a similar nature, Christianus Helwich (1700, Obs. 70, pp. 136-137), stated that a girl recently brought to him with a fever had had both eyes like those of a calf.§
Kalkaboda. In his book On Meteors,† Joan Petri Klint (d. 1608), a Swedish clergyman and historian, gives an account (translated in Rosen 1994) of a cow-human hybrid born in March 1588,
Italy. In the present context, it is worth mentioning that the 16th-century Paduan anatomist and surgeon Hieronymus Fabricius (1537-1619), in his De gula, ventriculo, intestinis tractatus (1618), reported (see Fabricius 1738, p. 137b) dissecting a man who chewed cud and whose father had a “horn on his forehead at least as thick as a finger, and as long as a Spanish olive.” On this basis, Fabricius concluded that these men had some type of hereditary connection with horned beasts (“parentis semen aliquam habuisse affinitatem cum cornigeris animalibus”). Indeed, modern medical research has revealed that many humans ruminate (about human rumination).
Norway and Hernberg. Franck (1585, p. 1038) states that in the year 1578, two calves were born with human heads, one in Norway (“im Landt zu Bergen”), the other in the town of Hernberg in Germany.
Bamberg, Germany. Jobus Fincelius, the sixteenth-century German humanist and physician, was a professor of philosophy and medicine at the University of Jena. He authored a two-volume work entitled Wunderzeichen in which he lists events he interpreted as miraculous signs. Among them was a creature with human features supposedly birthed by a cow near Bamberg in northern Bavaria. The following is his account (Fincelius 1559, vol. 2): “In the same year of 1556, on the 24th of July,
So again, in this account the alleged cow-human hybrid has a human-like head and torso, but cloven hooves and a tail. Also, as did Schreter and Carrington, Fincelius says the Kleisdorf birth had breasts like a woman’s (see also the image of Kamadhenu above). The Freewater animal, in the quoted news report above, also was described as having breasts. And in the present case, as in the ones reported by Carrington, by Schreyer, by Rozier and Mongez, and in the 1913 case in Vermont, the hybrid supposedly had facial hair around its mouth.
Fincelius says the creature born near Bamberg “did not live long,” but Lycosthenes, who also reported this birth, makes no such statement. Conceivably, this strange being survived, which might then account for historian Philipp Camerarius’ bizarre tale of the so-called Bamberger cattle-boy. Camerarius (Operae Horarum Subcisivarum, 1624, vol. 1, ch. 75, p. 343) described a “human” quadruped, which he said he often saw in his hometown of Bamberg. His report inspired Linnaeus to list “Juvenis bovinus bambergensis” in the Systema naturae (1758) as a specimen of Homo sapiens ferus (“wild man”). Later authors construed the cattle-boy as an example of a feral child. The following is the passage in question:
In the court of the Prince-Bishop of Bamberg, we have often gazed in wonder upon a man who, as he himself affirmed, grew up among the cattle of the neighboring mountains. He was so swift and agile that those who beheld him were filled with awe. There were many therefore who thought he deceived the eyes with magic. But it seemed to me that this was in no way certain, nor did I think he had the power to do such a thing even if he had so desired. But the most surprising thing about him was that he accomplished these displays of agility, not standing erect, but rather on all fours.
There in his court, the Prince-Bishop kept a certain dwarf by the name of Marinette who rode this agile being as if he were a horse, turning him in circles and riding him hither and thither, drilling him in various ways, though, in truth if he wanted he could buck off his rider with a single leap, no matter how hard he might try to hold on.
Afterward this quadruped would pick a fight with the dogs some of which were extremely ferocious and then, with his barking and growling, and his dangling hair, drive them from the room. Sometimes they would chase after him and try to catch him with their teeth, but this quadruped, with amazing leaps, would hop all around the room, as even a monkey could scarcely have done, as he was from the country and so fit. And seemingly he did this without the least difficulty.
Once, while I was eating lunch with the Prince-Bishop, after the quadruped had shaken off his dwarf rider and shagged the dogs from the room, I saw him leap from behind over the head of one of the guests onto the table, without disturbing the cups and dishes, and then leap onward to the upper parts of the room, with such speed that, like a squirrel—or like Julius Caesar Scaliger’s Indian cat—he seemed to fly. He would run around high up on the roof as if he were a cat, and it were the easiest and most ordinary thing to do. Moreover, he performed various other tricks with his agility, so that now he is spoken of everywhere as an unprecedented phenomenon. [Translated by E. M. McCarthy. Original Latin]
Is it conceivable, then that this quadruped, was the same creature born at Kleisdorf in 1556? If so, it would explain why he went on four legs and “grew up among the cattle of the neighboring mountains.”
Bitterfeld, Germany. Caspar Peucer (1525-1602), a physician who married the daughter of Luther’s colleague Philipp Melanchthon, mentions a another German case, a creature supposedly found dead near the town of Bitterfeld in 1547. Peucer’s brief account (Peucer 1553, pp. 326-327) reads as follows:
If a woman gives birth to an ox, the king of universal rule will prevail in the land.
|
Although far less common than reports about cows giving birth to cow-human hybrids, some reports do exist about such creatures being birthed by women. These accounts seem to describe offspring that differ from those birthed by cows, in that they are alleged to have bodies that are more human-like, and faces, more cow-like than are those of hybrids birthed by cows. Three of the reports also mention that the hybrid walked erect. These accounts, then, are more in agreement with the appearance of the Minotaur of Greek legend, which also was supposedly birthed by a woman, Queen Pasiphae of Crete.
Thus, the following report describes a case of an ostensible cow-human hybrid, with the face of a calf, being birthed by a woman, just as in the ancient Minoan case—but this report was published 1905.
Louisville, Kentucky. The notice quoted below appeared on page 4, column 5, of the November 22, 1905, issue of The Fairmont West Virginian, a newspaper published in Fairmont, West Virginia (source). It reads as follows:
Pebble Township, Ohio. A long article, originally published in the Chillicothe, Ohio, Leader, about a fully viable minotaur who lived for several decades in Ohio, appeared in the Cairo, Illinois, Bulletin (May 28, 1884, p. 24, cols. 2&3):
Yuma, Arizona. The Los Angeles Herald (July 21, 1875) carried the following item from Yuma, Arizona:
Jackson, Tennessee. Another case describing a hybrid with the minotaur configuration is reported from Tennessee. If this individual was in fact a hybrid, then presumably, since she was named and dressed as a woman, she was the offspring of a woman, not a cow. This report appeared in the the Clarksville, Tennessee Weekly Chronicle (May 20, 1876, p. 1, col. 9). Similar reports appeared in papers across the United States.
The case of Frances McClellan is especially interesting, not only because the description given of her differs from that typically given in reports about cow-human hybrids birthed by cattle, but also because she supposedly reached an advanced age, was raised as part of a human family, and could communicate (perhaps talk?) in a sufficiently human way to allow her to go shopping in town.
Lyon, France. A case dating to the eighteenth century is recorded in Jean-Ferapie Dufieu’s Traité de physiologie (Lyon, 1763, vol. I, pp. 228-229) in which the author, a French physician, describes an “infant” baptized in Lyon. Thus, he writes that “on the 20th of January, 1759, the vicar of Saint-Nizier in Lyon baptized an infant who had features like
So here again the mother is supposed to have been a woman, not a cow. (Presumably no one would have chosen to have this creature baptized in a church if it had been birthed by a cow.) And here again, the alleged hybrid has a face that is more cow-like.
Waltersdorf, Germany. One cow-human hybrid actually played a significant role in the Reformation. Martin Luther claimed that a monstrous human-like calf born on Dec. 8, 1522, at the village of Waltersdorf near Freiberg (about 70 miles southeast of Luther’s Wittenberg) was a sign from God that the Catholic Church was corrupt. Catholics, in their turn, interpreted it as a sign that Luther was accursed by God.
Pictured at right, this creature was, according to Aldrovandi (1642, p. 372, citing Amboise Pare and Jakob Ruf†), born of a woman. Supposedly, it had a deformed head, stood upright, had hooves instead of hands and feet, and on its shoulders, a cape-like flap of skin that Luther likened to a monk’s cowl, for which reason it became known as the Monk Calf (German: Munchkalb). It seems that Lucas Cranach the Elder, the creator of the only surviving representation of this creature (above, right), was living in Wittenberg in 1522, which suggests his drawing may have been based on direct observation.
Locale unknown. Another description of an exceptional cow-human born of a woman appears in a letter published in the German periodical Der Teutsche Mercur (1784, pp. 253-263), published and edited by Christoph Martin Wieland. It, too, depicts an individual with a head that is more cow-like than what is usually described in reports alleging hybrids produced from cows. Here translated into English, it tells of three sisters who kept, in a room at the back of their house, a creature that, at least based on its description, must have been a 32-year-old, fully viable cow-human hybrid. It is the sister’s maintaining this creature in their own house for many years, despite extreme inconvenience, that suggests it was birthed by a family member, perhaps their mother.
People seek to follow Nature down her most secret paths, preferring to entertain themselves with the infinite peculiarities of her productions, a truly fruitful occupation for the reflective mind. And here in this letter, my friend, you have a contribution to the natural sciences whose subject you will find most remarkably strange.
In one of the local suburbs lives a family of three sisters. But there is also a fourth member of their household, a creature that could just as well be classified as either human or animal. It is human in form, but eats and acts like a beast. And had I not been hardened by the study of natural history, I would have been shaken with horror at the very sight of it.
The three sisters are fully aware of the dread this creature inspires, which is why they make it so hard to see. They keep it hidden away in a back room, and for years have been covering up its existence by saying it was dead. But I learned it was not, and I went to the utmost trouble to see this nondescript with my own eyes. Public opinion indeed made a great monster of it, but what I in the end saw myself was even more terrible than anything anyone had described. I was taken to a small room at the back. As we went in an appalling stench struck my nostrils, and it became even worse as I approached a misshapen form, asleep upon a mattress. As it lay there, I could see the thing had an unnaturally thick head, upon which, here and there, were scattered wisps of blonde hair. The forehead was broad and flat as an ox brow, but smooth and without the slightest wrinkle. It had no eyebrows. The nose was a full two inches wide, and seemed to be pressed out wide. She had only one nostril, the other had grown shut. The upper lip was missing, but in its place was tight white row of upper teeth, which were unusually wide. The lower lip was round and very thick, blue and repulsive. Just below the chin a fleshy growth stood out, larger that an ordinary goiter, but hanging and limp. Close beneath it rose a pair of prominent breasts. A pair of small round teats, like a fourteen-year-old girl’s (the creature is female) swayed back and forth, and beneath them was a belly swollen like that of a pregnant woman. The feet were crooked and turned inward. There were no toes. They had grown together, as had her fingers. Her arms were thin and undeveloped. The bone seemed to be covered with only with a thin yellow skin. Indeed, the entire creature was bright yellow, which made her inexpressibly repulsive.
The creature still slept and I expressed to my wish to see it awake. The maid, my guide, told me I must not scare it, and gave it a shake. Suddenly it opened its eyes and uttered a cry that pierced me to my core. It was the natural voice of an ordinary calf. It beat the air with its hands and feet, and to calm it, the girl placed a flat bowl of porridge, a mixture of milk and grated bread, near to its mouth. It sniffed and at once it lowered its whole head into the bowl and, with its eyes closed, slurped up the milk like a dog. When bread got stuck between his teeth, it chewed and lifted its head slightly from the bowl. It was a horrible thing to see.
The creature is so greedy that one cannot take away its dish without it’s raising a terrible mooing and thrashing about with its hands and feet. I had a small dog with me who was lured by the scent of the milk. Before venturing to the bowl, he paced round the creature three times, and when it failed to make way, he began to bark. The thing seemed to be listening, but never stopped licking until the whole bowl was empty. And then it sniffed round the bowl and licked the floor.
And then it began its lowing once again, not so loud as before, but rather more like the weak voice of a drunkard whose tongue is too heavy, and stomach, too full. Now it began to throw itself about and to roll from side to side, thrashing its hands and feet in the air. The girl said that she always does this after she’s eaten, and that often she seems to smile, but I myself saw no smile. Presumably, such expressions are elicited by a feeling of well-being from satisfying a basic animal need.
At first I thought it would to go to sleep again, but it didn’t. Instead, it thrashed and rolled about, harder than ever, and finally rolled right off the mattress onto the hard floor. But it seemed not to notice. Rather, it continued these movements even more frenetically, and in the end rolled right out of the cloth in which it was wrapped, so that it lay completely naked before me. For it had no garments beneath. Really, I have no idea how they dress it at all, given that it is always rolling and dragging itself about from one place to another on its belly, or on its hands and feet.
It is always hungry. And if you place a full bowl before it, it will fall upon it at once and never stop eating before it is emptied to the bottom. It usually eats six times a day, and its forceful cries make the feeding times clear.
It refuses to eat bread, unless it has been crumbled. Nor will it eat meat or legumes. If one offers it such food, it may eat for a while, but it seems to taste at once that it is not its usual fare, and then it raises a great cry and does not leave off until it gets its customary porridge of milk and grated bread. And then when it has finished eating, it always behaves as I have already described. This dish must therefore always be at hand because often this creature will cry out in the middle of the night or early in the morning and wake the whole house and never stop until someone has brought it food.
Unable to speak, its only voice is its calf-like lowing. Nor, seemingly, does it hear properly either. For I stood next to it and stamped loudly against the floor, and I also struck a nearby leather-covered chair with a metal pipe, but it brought no reaction. But it must be able to hear the door, for the girl said it was always drooling when it opened, which is not surprising, since it only opens when food is being delivered. The other sisters do not trouble themselves with its care—and I must say, I do not care to see it again myself.
Nevertheless I did inquire about many things, so that I might determine whether this monstrosity† showed any human desires and impulses, other than the most basic animal cravings. But I failed to get any information, partly because the girl sees this thing only a few times a day—and that for a short time—and partly because she has grown too accustomed to it to feel any curiosity. I would have liked to have spent a week or two observing it, but it simply wasn’t possible. I had enough trouble even seeing it once. In fact, my sister had to promise the maid that if she was caught by her employers and dismissed, that she would take her into her own service. But I can’t really hold it against the sisters.
In the summer they often put the creature out in a high-walled garden. The neighbors became aware of its presence and began peering over the wall. But the sisters complained to the authorities, who expressly prohibited this intrusive behavior, for the neighbors were extremely curious and, at one point, a throng standing on ladders rang the walls.
And then the sisters had a roofed garden house built where the creature could stay during the summer and planted a lawn around it, for its room reeked so much that opening the door made the whole house stink. But at first she refused to stay there, until finally it was realized that she loved the sun. The house was then turned to admit the sunlight and then she would spend the entire day there or lolling on the lawn, where she was often heard mooing, not in a distressed way, but more like small cries of joy. They often neglected to bring her into her room at night, only to find her in the morning all fresh and frisky out in the open.
And now a bit of a detour. The chambermaid told me that sometimes, especially in the spring, the creature will lie on the lawn in the sun and roll about, so much that it ends up completely naked, and then it moans, thrusts, pants and seems to smile. “Thrusts?” I said in all innocence. At this the girl blushed a deep red, and I suddenly realized what she had meant. These movements were nothing more or less than the expression of that same natural drive seen many young girls.
…
While the creature is out in the garden they fumigate its room. But they cannot do so as often as they would like, because after a fumigation the creature stays up all night. When they bring it in, it begins sneezing over and over and then starts up with loud mooing, and keeps it up throughout in the night. It must be very irritable. So the sisters are put to a lot of bother in the winter, given that the beast is easily chilled and it must be kept in a heated room already in September.
What is most surprising is that this unfortunate creature is 32 years old. Ordinarily such beings die soon after birth, but this individual is an exception. However, it seems that it was formerly friskier and less thin, and that it smiled and ate more. It has only been sick a few times in its life, and even on those rare occasions it recovered its appetite and bounced back in just a few days. It does not at all like to drink, but gets what liquid it needs from its milk porridge, which it laps up. It allows no one to feed it. It grew only for its first twelve years, reaching then its mature size. It is only three-and-a-half feet long. I wanted to include a drawing of this creature, but I myself cannot draw, and it wasn’t possible to bring someone along who could.
The final two paragraphs are omitted here because they are mere speculation about why the mother had given birth to such a creature.
† The German word used was Mondkalb, equivalent to the obsolete English word mooncalf, meaning monstrosity or abortion. The old idea was that exposure to celestial influences, such as moonbeams, was the cause of such births.
Conrad Lycosthenes (1557, p. 649) says a woman gave birth to a cow-human on a Pomeranian farm called Rossauw near Pasewalk in December, 1555. But his description seems not to correspond with the Minotaur pattern. He says that it had the body of a calf, but a naked, round head, much like that of an ape, that the chin was bearded, that the front legs were stumps, but the hind legs, like a cow’s. This description corresponds reasonably well with the descriptions given in reports about cow-humans birthed by cows, so it may be that Lycosthenes had heard of the birth, but was simply mistaken in saying it was birthed by a woman. Possibly, too, a woman was merely accused of birthing this creature when it was actually birthed by a cow. But, again, if this creature actually was birthed by a woman, it was not Minotaur-like. (Liceti (1665, p. 188), and also Palfijn and Mauriceau (1708, p. 203), reiterate Lycosthene’s report.)
A quite atypical case, supposedly birthed by a woman, is briefly described in the eighteenth-century medical dictionary Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel et Raisonné de Médecine, de Chirurgie et de l’Art Vétérinaire, vol. IV, Paris, 1772, p. 392. According to the account, a certain midwife, Marie de Mony, delivered a woman of a child that was normal in its upper parts as far down as the navel, but just beneath that point, a leg sprouted from the abdomen. It, too, was supposedly normal, except in that it terminated in a hoof like that of a cow. This brief mention, however, was unsupported by any cited sources and seems not to be corroborated in other publications. Nor could any reference to this midwife, “Marie de Mony,” be found elsewhere. So this account may well be fictional.
Incertae sedis. Ahlfeld (1877) described a male anencephalic born to a human mother. It had a protruding muzzle which Ahlfeld (p. 160) says even against his will made him “think of calves, foals, and the like.”
Japanese belief in cow-human hybrids >>
By the same author: Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World, Oxford University Press (2006).
Eugène Boudou, known as L’Homme à la Tête de Veau (The Calf-headed Man), was a stage performer who sang in Paris cabarets during the early 1880s. Though he was described as having a head like that of a calf, it appears from pictures (see below) that he differed from other human beings only with respect to the structure of his mouth, which resembled that of a non-human animal. However, from available images, it is not clear that he specifically resembled a calf, as opposed to some other kind of animal, even in that region of his face. Thus, he would seem to constitute an incertae sedis case and is only provisionally listed here with other reports about cow-humans due to his stage name.
A story that made the rounds of world newspapers in 1870 claimed that the poet Lord Byron was a cow-human, or, at least, an artiodactyl-human, hybrid of some sort, whose development had been influenced in the womb when his mother encountered a painted image of Satan. Byron’s right foot was in fact deformed, but the exact nature of the deformity remains a matter of dispute, and the following rendition of the story, taken from the Marin County Journal (Jan. 22, 1870, p. 3, col. 1), seems little more than unsubstantiated fantasy based on rumor:
An entire new solution of the Byron mystery is furnished by a writer in the Madras Mail, who says that his father had it from one of Lord Byron’s most intimate friends. According to this lively correspondent, whose story we find in the Echo, Lord Byron was, in a sense, a devil. Incredible as the thing may seem to the thoughtless, the handsomest man in England had a small tail, a pair of rudimentary horns, and short squab feet, divided forward from the instep into two parts instead of being furnished with toes. Before he was born, his mother had been greatly terrified by seeing, when in a very delicate state of health, the celebrated picture of Satan Spurned, in the gallery at La Haye, and the result had been the fashioning of her child to some extent after the monstrous form of which the sight caused her alarm, and of which the continuous recollection could not be effaced by any means known to her physicians. At Byron’s birth it was at first suggested that the monstrosity should not be suffered to live but the child’s body, as a whole, was so perfectly shaped, and its face so wondrously beautiful, that the suggestion was forthwith put aside, and England was not deprived of what was to become in due time one of its chiefest ornaments. Poor Lady Byron never recovered wholly from the shock caused by the discovery of what her husband really was; and partly through excess of imagination, partly in consequence of bad advice from persons who shall be nameless, she felt it to be her duty to insist upon her husband subjecting himself to certain painful operations. But this Lord Byron obstinately refused to do. He urged, and with considerable force, that the peculiar manner in which he wore his abundant curls effectually hid from view the rudimentary horns; and, that, as he never appeared in public without his boots and trousers, none would ever suspect the existence of his other defects, with the exception of his valet, in whom he placed implicit confidence.
And in the B movie Gothic (1986 Virgin Vision), Byron’s lover Claire jokingly suggests he is the Devil incarnate and tries to pull off his boots to reveal his cloven hooves.
However, Hirschmann (2020), citing multiple sources, offers a strong case supporting the conclusion that Byron's deformity was an ordinary clubfoot.
A supposedly nonfictional case of cow-human hybrid was described by the Jesuit theologian Martin Delrio (1551-1608). If true, it would be of interest mainly because this particular hybrid, if it was a hybrid at all, was indistinguishable from a human being. Delrio’s account (Delrio 1755, p. 149) reads as follows:
Schenck (1609, pp. 149-150) reports a second case, which supposedly took place at Burgos in Spain in 1597. But here, supposedly, two children, a boy and a girl, were birthed by a cow.
These are two of the numerous reports, quoted elsewhere on this website, that allege the occurrence of xenogenesis.
|
Most shared on Macroevolution.net: